作者:
Donald Preziosi 出版社: OUP Oxford 副标题: A Critical Anthology 出版年: 2009-2-26 页数: 600 定价: GBP 17.99 装帧: Paperback 丛书:Oxford History of Art ISBN: 9780199229840
This masterly collection of texts interrogates the raging academic question, What is art history? Editor Preziosi, who directs ground-breaking critical studies of art history and museology, provides introductions to 35 challenging readings gathered in nine chapters. This plethora of alternatives is curiously complicated, even obfuscating. Covered here are the most current and r...
This masterly collection of texts interrogates the raging academic question, What is art history? Editor Preziosi, who directs ground-breaking critical studies of art history and museology, provides introductions to 35 challenging readings gathered in nine chapters. This plethora of alternatives is curiously complicated, even obfuscating. Covered here are the most current and relevant approaches to aesthetics, style, iconography and semiology, feminism, gender studies, formalism, postmodernism, deconstruction, museography, hybridity, and multiculturalism; those offering critical analysis range from Winckelmann, Kant, Wolfflin, Panofsky, Schapiro, Gombrich, and Derrida to Rosalind Krauss and Carol Duncan. Ultimately, this book is best suited to upper- and graduate-level collections and to the reference shelf of specialized art collections, as it proposes the discipline of art history itself as an art.AMary Hamel-Schwulst, Towson Univ., MD
0 有用 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒂𝒎𝒌𝒆𝒊𝒕 2021-08-16 16:32:01
①新版调整了基本架构，增补了几篇文章，总体质量当属上乘。②值得注意的是，普雷齐奥西将原本的跋《艺术史的艺术》移到了倒数第二篇的位置，新的最后一篇却又写得没那么精彩，这个调整不知意在何为。③可惜旧版的问题仍然存在，即删节标准很迷。比如德里达那篇关于海德格尔和夏皮罗的文章，原文就已经足够跳跃，一删节就更让人摸不着头脑。
0 有用 无端 2015-11-23 04:12:00
有些组合和删去的地方感觉不是特别得当
0 有用 沙耶的果冻 2017-03-13 09:40:38
基本的主流方法论都有涉及，每一个章节文章对主题的阐释也非常精辟
0 有用 :D 2022-04-21 21:25:57
有些反感强行给别人的文章加小标题 而且没有保留文章原本的幅度
1 有用 冷锋 2017-09-04 14:46:54
关键词：涵盖
0 有用 :D 2022-04-21 21:25:57
有些反感强行给别人的文章加小标题 而且没有保留文章原本的幅度
0 有用 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒂𝒎𝒌𝒆𝒊𝒕 2021-08-16 16:32:01
①新版调整了基本架构，增补了几篇文章，总体质量当属上乘。②值得注意的是，普雷齐奥西将原本的跋《艺术史的艺术》移到了倒数第二篇的位置，新的最后一篇却又写得没那么精彩，这个调整不知意在何为。③可惜旧版的问题仍然存在，即删节标准很迷。比如德里达那篇关于海德格尔和夏皮罗的文章，原文就已经足够跳跃，一删节就更让人摸不着头脑。
1 有用 曳尾.avi 2020-01-05 00:37:44
喜欢贡布里希把风格放在一个通过比较产生意义的系统里来研究。以及stylistic physiognomics这个词好神棍QAQ
0 有用 oonira 2019-01-06 20:36:56
艺术史学科的课本咯
1 有用 冷锋 2017-09-04 14:46:54
关键词：涵盖