[讲座] Edward G. Goetz6月16：保障性住房政策的演变：法国与美国的比较

题 目：Trajectories of Public Housing: A Comparative Analysis of France and the U.S 保障性住房政策的演变：法国与美国的比较 主讲人：Edward G. Goetz 美国明尼苏达大学Humphrey公共事务学院教授、城市与区域规划研究中心主任 主持人：刘志林 清华大学公共管理学院副教授 时 间：2015年6月16日 星期二 下午2:00-4:00 地 点：清华大学公共管理学院302教室 主讲人简介： Edward G. Goetz教授是住房与社区发展政策领域的知名学者，他的研究领域主要集中在种族与贫困问题如何影响到美国的住房政策设计与实施。Goetz教授同时是明尼苏达大学城市与区域规划研究中心主任、并曾任Humphrey公共事务学院副院长及城市与区域规划硕士项目主任。他也曾任职于多个与保障性住房政策和社区发展有关的地方与全国性机构的指导委员会。Goetz教授在保障性住房政策领域已出版多本专著，包括《 Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America》(2003, Urban Institute Press), 《Shelter Burden: Local Politics and Progressive Housing Policy》 (1993, Temple University Press), 《The New Localism: Comparative Urban Politics in a Global Era》(1993, Sage Publications)。他最新出版的专著《New Deal Ruins: Race, Economic Justice, and Public Housing Policy 》研究了美国公共住房政策如何逐步解体的(2013, Cornell University Press)。 Professor Edward G. Goetz specializes in housing and local community development planning and policy. His research focuses on issues of race and poverty and how they affect housing policy planning and implementation. His most recent book, New Deal Ruins: Race, Economic Justice, and Public Housing Policy (2013, Cornell University Press), examines the dismantling of the public housing program in the U.S. Goetz is the Director of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota, and co-Director of the University-Metropolitan Consortium. He has served as Associate Dean and as Director of the Masters of Urban and Regional Planning program at the Humphrey School. He has served on a variety of local and national advisory committees on issuesrelated to affordable housing and community development. Goetz is also the author of Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America (2003, Urban Institute Press), Shelter Burden: Local Politics and Progressive Housing Policy (1993, Temple University Press), and co-editor of The New Localism: Comparative Urban Politics in a Global Era (1993, Sage Publications). 讲座摘要： Social housing in France and public housing in the U.S. have followed similar trajectories. Both countries embarked on their publichousing efforts in the mid-20th Century only to see their efforts become associated with high levels of social dysfunction. In the U.S. publichousing was concentrated in inner-city areas while in France it was clustered outside of the city. Nevertheless, in both places public housing communities evolved into high-poverty, marginalized, and stigmatized neighborhoods. Edward Goetz looks at the similarities in the provision of public housing in France and the U.S., especially at how these communities concentrated racial and ethnic minorities, and became associated with urban decline, and served to mask deeper social, economic, and political issues in each country. Even the strategies for restructuring public housing are similar across the two settings, suggesting a more universal set of political processes driving the provision of housing for lower-income citizens.