波菲利问题

“I shall attempt, in making you a concise exposition, to rehearse, briefly and as in the manner of an introduction, what the older masters say, avoiding deeper inquiries and aiming suitably at the more simple. For example, about genera and species—whether they subsist, whether they actually depend on bare thoughts alone, whether if they actually subsist they are bodies or incorporeal and whether they are separable or are in perceptible items and subsist about them—these matters I shall decline to discuss, such a subject being very deep and demanding another and a larger investigation.”
  —— 《Introduction》
这个就叫 问入歧途 以问题来引导思路
熟悉亚里士多德哲学的都知道 导论里面的问题都是很假的
实际上在正文里面都是按照这个路数探讨的 是故意设问
范畴篇只有在解释篇的观照之下 视域之内才能得以理解
所以说波菲利问题根本就是问错了 脱离了 范畴篇和解释篇的语境
是逻辑学 而不是 存在论啊