英国法官裁判吐槽1
Kirby v Telegraph Group Plc [1999] E.M.L.R. 303, 313 (per Roch LJ)
“(争点概括，挺正常的)Another argument addressed to us on behalf of the appellant was that the claim for special damage resulting from the loss of his partnership was a separate cause of action and conse-quently did not merge in the judgment of March 19, 1997. (吐槽乱入中) Among the authorities relied upon for this proposition were Saunders v. Edwards (1663) 1 Sid. 95 , Sir T. Raym. 61 and Littleboy v. Wright (1674) 1 Sid. 95 , 1 Keb. 328 which gave counsel the opportunity to demonstate their understanding of Norman French... ”
嗯，那第一份17世纪的判决是这样开头的：“Queux actions pur parolls sont deins Lestat' de Limitations coment damages serra recover...” (82 E.R. 991, westlaw)
“(争点概括，挺正常的)Another argument addressed to us on behalf of the appellant was that the claim for special damage resulting from the loss of his partnership was a separate cause of action and conse-quently did not merge in the judgment of March 19, 1997. (吐槽乱入中) Among the authorities relied upon for this proposition were Saunders v. Edwards (1663) 1 Sid. 95 , Sir T. Raym. 61 and Littleboy v. Wright (1674) 1 Sid. 95 , 1 Keb. 328 which gave counsel the opportunity to demonstate their understanding of Norman French... ”
嗯，那第一份17世纪的判决是这样开头的：“Queux actions pur parolls sont deins Lestat' de Limitations coment damages serra recover...” (82 E.R. 991, westlaw)
