英语世界引用率最高的在世哲学家（2015年不完全统计版）
The 85 (or so) most cited living philosophers with public Google Scholar pages (CORRECTED)
豆主按：
资料来源：http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2015/05/the-most-cited-living-philosophers-with-public-google-scholar-pages.html，莱特报告（Leiter Reports），91位
统计时间：2015年5月
统计方法：以谷歌学术网页的引用率公开数据为基础的“不完全统计”，仅具有一定的参考意义
存在问题：从学校分布来看，美国最多，英国顶尖高校次之，加拿大、澳大利亚也有部分，所以在原标题前加上“英语世界”的限定语是合适的。部分反映了哲学界的学术霸权。试想，思想的影响力可否用引用率来衡量？法国理论家们、德国思想家们是不会同意的，遑论其它国家思想界中的执牛耳者？当然，统计者并未说这是最有影响力的哲学家，而且报告了自己的数据来源和统计方法，谨在此提醒读者们不要混淆。
补充链接：关于最有影响力的50名在世哲学家名单，可参见如下网址，部分学者多有重合，但又许多新的面孔（包括许多女性哲学家），似乎是莱特报告的一个有力补充。https://thebestschools.org/features/most-influential-living-philosophers/
[文中加粗的13人/正榜10人，为博主听说过的，个别科学哲学家/技术哲学家比较熟悉。可见，实在才疏学浅。]
[有些哲学家因没有谷歌学术网页而被忽略了。]This omits some philosophers who do not have such pages (like Tyler Burge [circa 8,000 cites], Allan Gibbard [circa 8,000 cites], Alvin Goldman [circa 15,000 cites], Philip Kitcher [circa 10,000 cites], Alasdair MacIntyre [circa 25,000 cites],John McDowell [circa 10,000 cites], Thomas Nagel [circa 25,000 cites], Martha Nussbaum [circa 30,000 cites], Derek Parfit [circa 10,000 cites], Hilary Putnam[circa 30,000 cites],Joseph Raz [circa 15,000 cites],T.M. Scanlon [circa 10,000 cites], Judith Thomson [circa 4,000 cites],among others).
1. John Searle (Berkeley) (83,755)
2. Jerry Fodor (Emeritus, Rutgers) (58,051)
3. Daniel Dennett (Tufts) (57,842)
4. Will Kymlicka (Queen's, Canada) (37,191)
5. Hubert Dreyfus (Emeritus, Berkeley) (30,733)
6. Saul Kripke (CUNY Grad Center) (21,892)
7. David Chalmers (NYU & ANU) (20,517)
8. Andy Clark (Edinburgh) (20,444)
9. Paul Thagard (Waterloo) (19,791)
10. Barry Smith (SUNY-Buffalo) (19,133)
11. Jaegwon Kim (Emeritus, Brown) (18,329)
12. Elliott Sober (Wisconsin) (17,122)
13. Philip Pettit (Princeton & ANU) (16,174)
14. Bas van Fraassen (San Francisco State; Emeritus, Princeton) (15,243)
15. Barbara Partee (Emerita, U Mass-Amherst) (14,311)
16. Larry Laudan (Texas) (11,846)
17. Frank Jackson (Emeritus, ANU) (11,465)
18. Ned Block (NYU) (10,972)
19. Timothy Williamson (Oxford) (10,705)
20. Stephen Stich (Rutgers) (10,636)
21. Shaun Gallagher (Memphis) (10,545)
22. John Worrall (LSE) (8,991)
23. Kim Sterelny (ANU & Victoria U) (8,230)
24. Peter Carruthers (Maryland) (7,990)
25. Ernest Sosa (Rutgers) (7,984)
26. Kent Bach (Emeritus, San Francisco State) (7,964)
27. Alva Noe (Berkeley) (7,886)
28. Cristina Bicchieri (Penn) (7,838)
29. Andrew Feenberg (Simon Fraser) (7,693) 技术哲学家，因技术批判理论闻名
30. D.C. Phillips (Emeritus, Stanford) (7,416)
31. Sven Ove Hansson (Royal Institute of Technology) (7,374)技术哲学家，因技术风险哲学闻名
32.J. Baird Callicott (North Texas) (7,306)
33. Brian Skyrms (UC Irvine & Stanford) (7,084)
34. Christine Korsgaard (Harvard) (6,933)
35. Shaun Nichols (Arizona) (6,519)
36. Luciano Floridi (Oxford) (6,438)，信息哲学
37. Sahotra Sarkar (Texas) (5,941)
38. Julian Savulescu (Oxford) (5,937)
39. Robert May (UC Davis) (5,853)
40. Joshua Knobe (Yale) (5,430)
41. Ernest LePore (Rutgers) (5,368)
42. Owen Flanagan (Duke) (5,072)
43. James Woodward (Pitt) (4,972)
44. Gerald Dworkin (Emeritus, UC Davis) (4,846)
45. Steven Best (Texas-El Paso) (4,720)
46. Paul Boghossian (NYU) (4,581)
47. John Dupre (Exeter) (4,558)
48. David Papineau (King's, London & CUNY) (4,551)
49. Jason Stanley (Yale) (4,536)
50. Rohit Parikh (CUNY) (4,529)
51. David Velleman (NYU) (4,493)
52. John Hawthorne (USC) (4,463)
53. Thomas Metzinger (Mainz) (4,423)
54. Charles Weijer (Western Ontario) (4,375)
55. Nick Bostrom (Oxford) (4,291)
56. Stephen Turner(South Florida) (4,097)
57. Harvey Siegel (Miami) (4,036)
58. Ted Sider (Cornell, moving to Rutgers) (4,002)
59. Carl Craver (Wash U/St. Louis) (3,898)
60. Alex Rosenberg (Duke) (3,826)
61. David Rosenthal (CUNY) (3,779)
62. Margaret Gilbert (UC Irvine) (3,765)
63. Lindley Darden (Maryland) (3,576)
64. Robert A. Wilson (Alberta) (3,421)
65. Robert Brandon (Duke) (3,396)
65. Keith DeRose (Yale) (3,396)
67. Brian Leiter (Chicago) (3,294)
68. Peter Railton (Michigan) (3,260)
69. Jonathan Schaffer (Rutgers) (3,249)
70. Stephen Yablo (MIT) (3,233)
71. Anthony Appiah (NYU) (3,182)
72. Tim Crane (Cambridge) (3,076)
73. Duncan Pritchard (Edinburgh) (2,969)
74. Kelly Oliver (Vanderbilt) (2,943)
75. David Brink (UC San Diego) (2,922)
76. Huw Price (Cambridge) (2,901)
77. Robert Gordon (Emeritus, Missouri-St. Louis) (2,820)
78. Gary Gutting (Notre Dame) (2,812)
79. Paul B. Thompson (Michigan State) (2,797)
80. Barry Loewer (Rutgers) (2,737)
81. Wolfgang Spohn (Emeritus, Konstanz) (2,713)
82. James Moor (Dartmouth) (2,687)
83. Jonathan Wolff (UCL) (2,679)
84. Stathis Psillos (Western Ontario) (2,674)
85. John Horty (Maryland) (2,660)
86. Alex Byrne (MIT) (2,643)
87. Alison Wylie (Washington) (2,641)
88. Hilary Kornblith (U Mass/Amherst) (2,638)
89. Ronald de Sousa (Emeritus, Toronto) (2,592)
90. Mark Colyvan (Sydney) (2,554)
91. Paul Humphreys (Virginia) (2,550)
ADDENDUM: 特例说明 There are some hard cases. Bob Goodin (ANU), for example, would easily be in the top 20 in terms of overall citations, but many are to works that have little or no philosophical dimension to them, since Goodin is also a leading scholar in political science.In other cases, scholars pick up cites because they have edited the work of a major philosopher of the past: the cites are mostly to that historical figure, but Google Scholar is fairly indiscriminating in how it counts (though authors can remove such counts from their totals).
