english vs chinese

english as a language was and has experienced deconstruction. it was an active process. compared to English, the deconstruction of chinese would have been relatively passive if it had existed. therefore, chinese as a language, especially in mainland china, has a much stronger power woven into it when used in its societies, possibly leading to overreaching or overarching in its contexts, especially in moral contexts, making itself challenging following the analytic tradition. on the other hand, philosophical inquiries in the context of chinese are prone to linguistic mistakes or redundancies, or prima facie discussions, in primary inquiries drifting away from contemporary paradigms. the inadequacy has even been exposed in literature and various art forms and, more importantly, in aesthetics beyond forms, not just in the products but also in the production process.